Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jurong Island Bus Terminal

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. · Katefan0^(scribble) 20:51, 14 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Google has no hits for "Jurong Island Bus Terminal". Altogether, this looks like a local bus stop on Jurong Island that is served by two local bus routes. Pilatus 19:13, 5 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• delete bus stops are too minor. --TimPope 20:38, 5 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete — doesn't appear notable in any respect. — RJH 21:18, 5 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. A bus terminal is not a bus stop. Duh. --Huaiwei 11:02, 6 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Don't think a bus terminal only served by two routes merit an encyclopædic article. — Instantnood 11:06, September 6, 2005 (UTC)
  • Comment. As the only bus terminal in Singapore to have hydrogran cell refueling facilities, I would think that is pretty notable, even if only two routes are operated from it.--Huaiwei 11:09, 6 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    • Agree. This piece of information was not available until your recent edit [1]. Nevertheless I'd suggest to have an article for all other terminals with less than 5 (or 10) routes, and link to the main articles of the more notable terminals. — Instantnood 11:13, September 6, 2005 (UTC)
• Weak Keep. I don't like it, but there are numerous other examples of this kind of article at Category:Bus stubs. If they stay, this should stay as well. Statement left by User:Khaosworks Pilatus 16:32, 6 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep bus terminals. --SPUI (talk) 16:42, 6 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Harmless, and verifiable. CalJW 18:53, 6 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. WP:POINT - Mailer Diablo 20:05, 6 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep --Vsion 23:11, 6 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep just like all the others, and for the same reason as Mailer Diablo SchmuckyTheCat 17:33, 7 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Just like Mailer Diablo and all the others. Advanced 13:38, 13 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.