Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Just one language
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Deleted per WP:OR (deleted by Jimfbleak). (Non-admin closure) ∙:∙:.:pepper:.:∙:∙ 19:08, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Just one language (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Pure OR. WP not a forum. Shovon (talk) 11:37, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete or userfy - user essay, not encyclopaedic and unlikely to be re-written to become encyclopaedic in the near future. Fæ (talk) 11:41, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. OR essay, not a suitable article. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:43, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Non-encyclopedic OR essay. ~~ GB fan ~~ 11:50, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Writer has mistaken Wikipedia for a forum. Acroterion (talk) 12:00, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, unencyclopedic, unsalvagable. Hairhorn (talk) 12:12, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Snowstorm incinerate. Please. -- Hoary (talk) 12:25, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Unencyclopedic user essay page. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 13:43, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete not an encyclopedia article -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 14:19, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep... wait, hang on... I meant Delete Catfish Jim and the soapdish (talk) 14:44, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Snow Delete - Why the hell wasn't this speedied? Carrite (talk) 15:39, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Under what Speedy category? -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:40, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I actually don't see a technical category this would fall under, even though this is a clear article that needs to be wiped off the face of the Earth. Weird. Speedy Delete under CSD:RTARDED :) Vodello (talk) 16:21, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- As you can see from the history, I really wanted to speedy it but had to settle for multiple tagging and let it compost a little before AFD. Fæ (talk) 16:26, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I actually don't see a technical category this would fall under, even though this is a clear article that needs to be wiped off the face of the Earth. Weird. Speedy Delete under CSD:RTARDED :) Vodello (talk) 16:21, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Under what Speedy category? -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:40, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete Essay written after 10 minutes of reefer Vodello (talk) 16:16, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete non-encyclopedic. Prsaucer1958 (talk) 16:23, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.