- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete as a copyvio or otherwise. Sjakkalle (Check!) 08:21, 18 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Advert for non-notable company. Delete. jni 10:20, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Perhaps should be judged by WP:WEB, looks to be a website-only business. Jkelly 17:24, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete. They are currently participating in an exhibition at the Manhattan Museum of Modern Art, which some may consider sufficient notability; however, they don't appear to be major participants (they're not mentioned by name on the exhibition's page [1]), so it probably isn't enough to justify an article. — Haeleth Talk 18:36, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete as it is a copyright vio, see [2] and [3] - Akamad 07:32, 12 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: speedy delete for copyright violations only applies to commercial content providers. This is promotional literature and people don't pay to see it. It should go to copyright problems instead. -- Kjkolb 08:33, 12 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I have removed the speedy delete nomination and placed copyright vio notice as suggested. Akamad 08:54, 12 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.