Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Justina Sharp

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Biblioworm 03:25, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Justina Sharp

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am not convinced of notability . Writing a piece for the Huffington Post and an opo for the NYTimes does not constitute notability. Everything else here is what she has herself written. DGG ( talk ) 17:09, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I would encourage you to read the page again and explore the subject. She is in an atypical industry for a young person. She has written several pieces for the Huffington Post as a regular blogger for several years. The pieces "she has herself written" are part of a website and its relations that she founded at the age of 13. I would say that she is on the same level of notability as many of the people her age with pages on Wikipedia. This page could perhaps use more detail about her, but I would not suggest deletion. Ploliv (talk) 23:11, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If there are other articles in wikipedia for people have done no more than that, please nominate them for deletion, or tell me which they are and I will do so. DGG ( talk ) 23:19, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You are more than welcome to explore that chasm on your own, but I would give this page a chance to become more detailed.Ploliv (talk) 23:22, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note : I am willing to find further references for this article, as I have already located several not included that would shore up her legitimacy.Ploliv 23:41, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:12, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:12, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:12, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:12, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep - Appeared on ABC News10, interviewed as a teen fashion expert in Today, passing mention Fox40, interviews in GoodDay Sacremento, KCRA News. JTdale ^Talk 11:45, 10 November 2014
Keep - Just featured on BuzzFeed "14 Teens To Look To For Style Inspiration" (talk) 22:48, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:35, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ⨹ 19:44, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - a news search returns a lot of Huffington post hits, and some other things. When BBC News wanted a soundbite about Barbie, they chose her quotation and put it in the sidebar above anyone else's. [1] Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 21:00, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete , does not meet notability criteria. - Cwobeel (talk) 23:56, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.