Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jyte (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. --Bongwarrior (talk) 00:43, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
Website that doesn't assert significance. Just describes history and features. Can't speedy because it survived a previous AfD (the article was created in vanity when the site was launched) with "no consensus" TheBilly (talk) 11:54, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for non-notability. It exists and has some users, but that does not make it notable. Springnuts (talk) 12:32, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not notable. RJC Talk 19:21, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- -- pb30<talk> 02:22, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Evil Spartan (talk) 00:02, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Article is non-notable. Ohmpandya (Talk) 02:43, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete not notable. Only one of the references is independent. JohnCD (talk) 14:26, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- 'Delete - insufficient reliable sources to establish notability -- Whpq (talk) 16:55, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per notability arguments. TheRingess (talk) 21:56, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.