Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KBFR (pirate radio)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Cirt (talk) 08:34, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

KBFR (pirate radio)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable pirate radio station; article completely consists of unsourced material Rapido (talk) 11:11, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. — Gongshow ^Talk 18:04, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as subject is the focus of multiple in-depth articles in multiple reliable third-party sources over a sustained period. These include this 2001 cover story from Boulder Weekly, this 2002 Boulder Weekly profile, and this 2008 article in Westword. Does the article need a lot of work? Heck yes, but AfD is not cleanup. - Dravecky (talk) 06:13, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Timotheus Canens (talk) 02:42, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep In addition to the sources Dravecky listed, there have also been several write-ups in the Daily Camera[1][2][3], a few more in the Westword[4][5][6], in the Colorado Daily[7] and one in JamBase[8]. They're mentioned in two books[9]. They were showcased at HOPE [10] and the CCC [11]. Not exactly reliable third party sources, but they do have several recordings in the Live Music Archive [12] and a few on Radio4all.net [13]. But if we're still short on reliable third party sources, how about the 12 FCC Field Notices served to them since 2003? -- Scarpy (talk) 06:32, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.