- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 17:08, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Incomplete AFD found by User:DumbBOT. No opinion from me. -Royalguard11Talk 22:53, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 10:05, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Delete Not even sure if the article is claiming notability in any way. 202 unique Google hits is rather low as well. -Elmer Clark 11:53, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, advertising for nonnotable company. User:Angr 15:07, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Delete — It has some longevity, and given the structure and history of the South Korean economy, being around since 1982 may give it some significance, but there's nothing to really establish notability. JChap2007 18:40, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Article does not name a single product of the company, and a brief web survey does not give evidence that the company is still operating (I'm not saying it isn't, but business must be slow...). Note: no transwiki link to Korean Wikipedia (> 25,000 articles). - Samsara (talk • contribs) 00:27, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: The company has 34,400 Google hits under its Korean name: [1] -- Visviva 01:54, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.