- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 02:44, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- KPDR-LD (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Subject does not meet the GNG. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 02:31, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Utah. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 02:31, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
I checked with the members of the Talking Utah Radio message boards and they informed me that this TV station is still licensed for Utah. It is also still sending out an RF signal as well. The website is down, but no other news has been announced at this time.CKStark (talk) 02:33, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Just because the station still exists doesn't mean it is automatically notable, as WP:NMEDIA is no longer a notability guideline. Thus, this subject must meet the GNG for it to have a standalone article, and I see nothing here to show that to be the case. Thus, Delete. Let'srun (talk) 02:45, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Existence is not notability. This article is definitely the product of the pre-2021 more-lax (interpretation of) notability standards in this topic area — but even then, the old NMEDIA's overpresumption of notability still required reliable sources. That often got overlooked years ago (and would not be allowed to persist in any newly-created mainspace page today), but even now the references section is completely empty. As currently written, this article thus wouldn't actually have actually met NMEDIA to the extent this was ever really applicable; suffice it to say it's nowhere near meeting the GNG. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:52, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.