- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Fritzpoll (talk) 13:21, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- KREproxy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable software product. Author has self-published the software at sourceforge and appears to be using Wikipedia to attempt to promote that software. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:36, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, Iam an author of this software but I dont want to promote me or my soft but I want to help people who writing Linux modules. I think that my work can help them, that is all. Sorry I dont know whether I should editing this page like this because I am new on wiki pages. Maybe someone can help in changing kREproxy wiki page content to adapt Wikipedia requirements. User:Marcintom —Preceding undated comment added 14:53, 27 February 2009 (UTC).[reply]
- Comment Your work may well be helpful and instructional, but it is not notable per Wikipedia standards. Your material might be better suited for Wikipedia's sister project, Wikiversity (but you will need to expand the instructional nature of the documentation), or it may be suitable for inclusion in other "how-to" sites, such as WikiHow. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 16:20, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete non-notable software, as per above. Jezhotwells (talk) 16:04, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete non-notable, self-promotion. Therblig (talk) 16:20, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Per nom, and another plea to establish notability guidelines for software so we can point people like User:Marcintom above to them and avoid giving the impression that we're including or excluding these things based on ever-varying sets of rather vague criteria. §FreeRangeFrog 00:33, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.