- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Nja247 09:09, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- KTechlab (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
non-notable software using wikipedia as free advert (for three years). I can find no thirdparty reliable sources. 16x9 (talk) 19:01, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- 16x9 (talk) 19:11, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: The only sources I have been able to find are a subchapter of a computer book written in Spanish (six-paragraphs long) and a webpage on linux.org. If these sources are not enough to confirm the notability of this software, perhaps this article can be merged to a Linux-related article? Cunard (talk) 19:22, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per lack of reliable, independent, extensive sources as spelled out at WP:N. --Jayron32.talk.contribs 20:39, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - fails WP:N, lack of significant coverage in reliable sources. Mr.Z-man 20:55, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above, plus the fact that according to its own web page the project is defunct. Looie496 (talk) 23:08, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.