Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KVZK-8

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Geschichte (talk) 12:56, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

KVZK-8

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

My research to improve KVZK-TV (KVZK-2) indicates that none of this information is true:

KVZK-TV slimmed down to three channels (2/4/5) in 1977
There is no AFN broadcast over the air that has come up in any of my searches
There is no broadcast channel 8 in any mention of KVZK after reducing its channel set
The actual KVZK-TV converted to digital from analog over a decade ago
The ERP listed would never have been assigned to an analog station

This is a hoax posted by an editor, User:Sickdearkorat, who was already blocked earlier this year for posting unsourced content. I get it, information on television in American Samoa is difficult to come by. But absolutely nothing here is grounded in fact. I have sent to AfD instead of CSD because this hoax is rather technical, much as with Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WWVS-LP. Raymie (t • c) 04:36, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Raymie (t • c) 04:36, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oceania-related deletion discussions. Raymie (t • c) 04:36, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Raymie (t • c) 04:36, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note to closer for soft deletion:? This nomination has had limited participation and falls within the standards set for lack of quorum. There are no previous AfD discussions, undeletions, or current redirects and no previous PRODs have been located. This nomination may be eligible for soft deletion at the end of its 7-day listing. --Cewbot (talk) 00:03, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Logs: 2020-06 ✍️ create

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.