Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kae's File Manager

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JForget 02:18, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kae's File Manager (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Zaroo independent sources for this, hic. Pcap ping 03:31, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Pcap ping 03:32, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I'm seeing a fair number of independent hits for this, but not from anything that could be considered reliable. Note that the article's primary author is the software's developer. —Korath (Talk) 03:51, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. No significant coverage found. Nothing to indicate notability.--Michig (talk) 12:01, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per everyone. JBsupreme (talk) 18:21, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Couldn't find any WP:Reliable Sources and the article doesn't provide anything to prove otherwise. Usually when GNews returns 0 results it is a pretty easy decision --FaceMash (talk) 00:31, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - nothing on Google news; doesn't seem to have the widespread coverage by reliable third parties that is required for inclusion. Cocytus [»talk«] 00:53, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.