- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 00:40, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Kagu (software) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable media player. Does not claim notability. Unsourced. In searching for sources that would make this a notable player I found Kagu got one minor review in Ars Technica when it was first created in 2007. It has not been updated since 2007. It has not created news since and being abandoned, is unlikely to become notable. It did not meet our notability requirements in 2007 and does not now. Miami33139 (talk) 03:51, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I did reference check myself and came up with nothing. Does not seem to meet notability guidelines.WackoJackO 07:04, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - It isn't notable (like all the others), doesn't demonstrate notability, and doesn't claim notability. I believe it to be blatant advertising (CSD G11). OlYellerTalktome 07:15, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.