- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 06:29, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Kate Graham (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable actor lacking GHits and GNEWS of substance. Fails WP:BIO and WP:ENTERTAINER. ttonyb (talk) 18:59, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- delete - Clearly fails WP:ENTERTAINER.LedRush (talk) 19:08, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Non-notable. Krashlandon (talk) 21:37, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- -- Cirt (talk) 22:14, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep - she acted as a major supporting character of a B-movie and a supporting guest star of a failed TV show, per WP:ENTERTAINER and WP:BARE. The other roles mostly do not even have names, which indicates they might be minor roles. The real question is whether in total those count as "significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows," etc. I am leaning to answer in the affirmative, but I don't know enough to be sure. Bearian (talk) 17:56, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:14, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:21, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Only appears to have had one significant role, and there appears to be little coverage of Graham herself around, so a BLP is not justified here.--Michig (talk) 07:10, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.