Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katherine Langrish
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was withdrawn. withdrawn (non-admin closure) RadioFan (talk) 10:34, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Katherine Langrish (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No indication of how this might meet notability guidelines. Lacks citations to significant coverage in reliable sources. RadioFan (talk) 02:27, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong and Speedy Keep. Multiple trade books from major publisher with multiple reviews in major genre and general publications.[1][2][3][4][5]. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 02:54, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: Going on WP:AGF, article creator is stating this is an internationally recognized author. Unless proven to be untrue, I would say keep the article. -OberRanks (talk) 05:23, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I found reviews of her works by The Guardian and The Times in the first half dozen Google News Archive hits. Then, the first page of a Google Books search showed two author profiles by other writers (not her books), plus a review in The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction. That was quick. She's notable. Cullen328 (talk) 05:34, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.