Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kawsar ahmed

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete per WP:G4. Kline | vroom vroom 22:16, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kawsar ahmed

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Kawsar ahmed (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't know what to do with this article. It's been tagged with several different speedy tags, so the best thing to do is discuss it. I am neutral. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 14:42, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:45, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:45, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - spam article; only covered in self-published sources or non-RS; does not meet WP:NMUSICIAN or WP:GNG, the situation has not changed since Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kawsar Ahmed and I believe that this is similar enough to be speedy deleted Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:01, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete WP:VANISPAM for a non-notable musician who's a legend in his own mind. --Worldbruce (talk) 15:16, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Excessive use of citations for little effect. Delete per nom. Oaktree b (talk) 16:21, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete the subject fails both WP:GNG - no significant coverage and WP:MUSICBIO.Less Unless (talk) 17:03, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as vanity spam. —Kbabej (talk) 17:08, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete Pure spam RationalPuff (talk) 17:33, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete per WP:CSD#G4. We've been here before. Pahunkat (talk) 18:35, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.