Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kay Nesbit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus is that this is not a WP:BLP1E situation. Additional references have been added during the AfD, and WP:GNG is met. (non-admin closure) power~enwiki (π, ν) 02:37, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kay Nesbit

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A BLP about a victim of a 1985. Falls under WP:BLP1E as being noted for that one event and otherwise being low-profile: subject of a 1989 book, mention of her being an advocate of victims's rights, and an unsuccessful state-level candidacy don't clear the bar for me. Calton | Talk 01:58, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 03:17, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 03:17, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 03:17, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: subject of a 1989 book, mention of her being an advocate of victims's rights, and an unsuccessful state-level candidacy don't clear the bar for me. – I'm not sure what the bar is for "otherwise low-profile". Somehow she and her name stuck in my head since the event got a lot of publicity over an extended a period, when I was a kid. But I don't have a strong opinion. --Chriswaterguy talk 10:57, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And yet you -- the creator of the article -- were unable to come up anything other than passing mentions? --Calton | Talk 11:50, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. A full book is not a passing mention. Running for parliament is not low profile. duffbeerforme (talk) 12:27, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I found plenty of news sources about her over time from Newspapers.com. I added the information to the article. Passes GNG. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 23:12, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Subject of a Penguin book. Quite a bit of newspaper coverage. Failed bid is besides the point as most of this is unrelated to the stint in politics.Icewhiz (talk) 23:23, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I have read about her, seen television programs about her, over multiple years..... There seems to be more than enough WP:NEXIST available to support GNG. Aoziwe (talk) 12:22, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Prolonged coverage including a biography by Penguin: seems notable enough. PamD 23:07, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.