- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Redirect (NAC) Tom29739 [talk] 21:33, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
- Kazuki Funatsu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
He's mainly known for a long-running series Addicted to Curry, but he has a second series called Youkai Shojou Monsuga that has charted on Oricon. But still tagged for notability. So is he notable or not? AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:42, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:42, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:42, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:42, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
- Redirect to Addicted to Curry as lacking notability outside of his most popular manga. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 01:25, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
- Redirect to Addicted to Curry, the author would be a likely search term for the series. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 16:41, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
- Redirect as I would've basically suggested deletion also but Redirecting may suffice for now (let's simply hope this is not restarted exactly the same however), there's nothing at all to suggest any actual independent notability and even though the nomination statement lists his other work, it seems clear enough that he's best known and longest worked for the main work, Addicted to Curry thus not currently independently notable. Enough consensus here, SwisterTwister talk 20:54, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.