- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 14:34, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Contested speedy. Version I originally deleted was undoubtedly had no assertion of notability; this one at least asserts some, so taking it here. Petros471 11:42, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, nonnotable company, 94 unique Ghits. NawlinWiki 11:44, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per NawlinWiki and as per WP:NN ST47 11:52, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete — Fails WP:CORP per lack of independent, non-trivial sources. JChap2007 18:43, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete. I'm concerned that the major claim to fame "polyepicell" returns on hits from google. Does anybody know how to search patents? If this did seem like a real innovation, then it would be greater grounds for notability.--Limegreen 03:24, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.