Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keating Economics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 03:45, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keating Economics (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

WP is not news. The article says this was a "documentary" but it sounds more like a 13 minute campaign ad. It will probably have no lasting importance. Steve Dufour (talk) 16:58, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Insignificant apart from the presidential campaign, therefore does not need its own article. Theseeker4 (talk) 17:58, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong delete This is article is a bad attempt at POV pushing full of misleading statements and misrepresentations. The article is about a youtube video and the statements I looked into regarding what's in the references are misrepresentations. Disturbing, and it's creators should probably be blocked. ChildofMidnight (talk) 19:23, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge I have removed the offending content. Now the problem is the title, which doesn't represent the article content (as well as being confusing and misleading). This conent probably belongs in the Presidential Campaign 2008. ChildofMidnight (talk) 20:19, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Attack page/campaign propaganda of minimal effect on the campaign. The Keating thing was raised, and dropped. I oppose a merge b/c that would leave a redirect, although useful content could certainly be incorporated. RayAYang (talk) 22:09, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. -- RayAYang (talk) 22:10, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - a peripheral part of the campaign, fails WP:N, we can delete especially now that it's over. Biruitorul ^Talk 22:32, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Turned out to be of minimal importance in campaign, no importance afterward. The Keating Five article already includes a brief mention of it. Wasted Time R (talk) 00:19, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.