- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep, nomination withdrawn -SpacemanSpiff 21:50, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Kelepathar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Very little meaningful content, unsuitable style, unsourced. If it didn't have possible notability as an existent village I would tag it under CSD.--Microcell (talk) 16:45, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- -SpacemanSpiff 23:33, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Now that it's been moved to the correct Latin character spelling of "Kalapathar", Keep. I think the nom was a bit hasty in nominating a town stub within 8 hours of its creation. [1] It took me a 5 second g-map search to learn the correct spelling and that its an actual village.[2]. When an editor thinks an article topic has "possible notability", they should follow WP:BEFORE and do minimal research before putting it up for AfD.--Oakshade (talk) 02:21, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - valid village stub.--Sodabottle (talk) 08:55, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, given that the entry has been improved and cleaned up - I withdraw the nomination as its initiator.--Microcell (talk) 20:16, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.