- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete \ Backslash Forwardslash / {talk} 13:11, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Kent Assembly (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
No references, no external links, mostly orphaned, seems to be either fictional or an extremely minority wish, could be a joke article. Joowwww (talk) 10:29, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, as nom. AFAICR this was a recurring, spurious topic once included in Kent but deleted. Example: [1].--Old Moonraker (talk) 10:36, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, per nom. If someone references the article to an official proposal, I'd reconsider. Kbthompson (talk) 11:12, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 13:16, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 13:16, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless sources are cited as to who is calling for this. As it stands, it's a soapbox article. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 20:00, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.