- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete JForget 01:22, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Kent Falcons (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable as per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Durham Saints, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edinburgh Predators, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swansea Titans, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Essex Blades (American football), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UEA Pirates and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NTU Renegades. British university sports teams for mainstream British sports such as soccer have next to no following. American Football has an even smaller following. Article is unreferenced, Google turns up only sites directly related to the team or its rivals. If you are in doubt as to the popularity of the team, look on the gallery on the teams own website and play spot the spectator. There are quite literally appears to be more members of the team than fan. Pit-yacker (talk) 23:47, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 15:13, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:13, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete notability standards not met, independent sources not provided.--Paul McDonald (talk) 17:52, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per nom and per Paul. Individual university sports teams in the UK are very rarely notable, and this one does not appear to be an exception. Pfainuk talk 20:47, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No sources provided despite the article being online a very long time. Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 14:54, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.