Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kent RO Systems (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draftify‎ The keep arguments are arguing that it seems notable, while also acknowledging that the article as written, with the current sourcing does not actually establish that. It seems there is a consensus that this article should not be in article space. Draftifying gives a chance for these issues to be rectified without leaving the article in public view. Beeblebrox ^Beebletalks 23:11, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kent RO Systems

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP and WP:CORPDEPTH. Indian media sources should be viewed carefully, as they often present press releases as news WP:RSNOI, WP:ROUTINE. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 15:03, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and India. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 15:03, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Health and fitness and Uttar Pradesh. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:07, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment as a public company with 40% market share it should be notable but the references in the article certainly need improving so hopefully some new ones will be presented in this discussion, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 19:48, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
+1, it does pass notability imo but it clearly needs major work before it can be passed of as an encyclopedia entry. Xoocit (talk) 10:04, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: References are weak for now. This article needs improvement with significant coverage from reliable sources. For now it is a Delete or Draft. B-Factor (talk) 07:06, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty (talk) 17:57, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.