Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kerän Sanders

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is that the subject does not meet notability guidelines. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:03, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kerän Sanders

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. WP:BLP of a radio personality, "referenced" only to her staff profile on the website of her own employer and not to any of the reliable source coverage about her that it takes to pass WP:GNG or WP:JOURNALIST. And furthermore, while the article is reworded sufficiently to avoid WP:COPYVIO issues, it adds nothing of substance besides being a straight rephrasing of the staff profile. As always, this is not how a radio personality gets a Wikipedia article -- she gets one by being the subject of coverage in media other than her own paycheque provider, not just by having a profile on her own employer's website. Bearcat (talk) 01:23, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Zero hits in Google news search, regular g-search not pulling up independent, reliable sources showing notability.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 02:46, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 03:49, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 03:49, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 03:49, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 03:49, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete lack of indepdent references to establish notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:21, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.