- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:09, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Kerwhizz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Does not meet notability requirements for TV shows Cabe6403 (Talk•Sign) 23:17, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. —Sarilox (talk) 04:08, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep There is some stuff that needs to be cut if it's not sourced, but the 1st and 4th reference are solid to establish notability. The 4th isn't about the show, but gives it a significant mention in the context of the article rather than a trivial one. - Mgm|(talk) 08:37, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per assserted and sourced notability. Article might benefit from cleanup, but that's not a reason for deletion. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 04:34, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep appears to have received substantial coverage (see Google News). Icewedge (talk) 06:31, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Sources are available to establish notability. --J.Mundo (talk) 00:24, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.