- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Eluchil404 (talk) 23:39, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Key Records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Unsourced. Only one line. I'm not sure if this is a real company. Cssiitcic (talk) 22:11, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete per CSD:A1. Tagged as such. Stifle (talk) 22:16, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Gonzalezzz A1 -- Ļıßζېấשּׂ~ۘ Ώƒ ﻚĢęخ (talk) 02:22, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment The speedy request has been declined. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:39, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 04:40, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 04:40, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete, no assertion of notability --JD554 (talk) 08:13, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, or possibly Userfy. Non-notable per WP:N. Of course, if rewritten to notability standards, perhaps Keep? -- MISTER ALCOHOL T C 04:23, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
- Speedy delete - Non-notable, poorly written, and possible hoax. Ward3001 (talk) 05:16, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.