Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keydata Corporation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Agent 86 00:13, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keydata Corporation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Article fails WP:CORP for notability. Akihabara 11:24, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Historically significant company. Once notable, always notable. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 19:47, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong keep. Historically important... like Kaypro, Studebaker, Wang Laboratories, and TWA. Dpbsmith (talk) 23:10, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, I agree that notability cannot be lost. JamesMLane t c 09:50, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.