- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Rjd0060 (talk) 21:43, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Kharmonics (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable neologism. nneonneo talk 20:14, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete as (delusional) nonsense. Check out the website [1]. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 20:55, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. There seems to be an album called "Kharmonics" from a band called "Zenpool", or maybe the other way round, but nothing else relevant. The only link in the article goes to a curious web page which starts "Tune in to the Universe... ", then talks about buying a "Kharmonica", and ends by warning against claiming copyright on computer-generated geometric patterns. I'm not sure what this is all about, but it certainly has no independent sources and isn't notable. JohnCD (talk) 21:04, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete non-notable neologism, unverifiable/original research. --Snigbrook (talk) 21:07, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non-notable, unverifiable neologism i.e. protologism. Stifle (talk) 21:14, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Seems to be originale research.Insearchofintelligentlife (talk) 03:05, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Non-notable neologism. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 03:38, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.