Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kicad StepUp

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:26, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kicad StepUp

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There's a {{notability}} tag on the article; let's settle this once and for all. I dream of horses (T) @ 21:20, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. I dream of horses (T) @ 21:21, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I didn't see anything particularly notable about the company, or any references supporting notability. ubiquity (talk) 21:26, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per ubiquity. No references supporting notability. - Happysailor ^(Talk) 07:11, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. A search turned up no significant WP:RS coverage. Article was created by an SPA as possibly promotional. Dialectric (talk) 12:58, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as there is unfortunately no better coverage and the best I seemed to have found was this. SwisterTwister talk 05:10, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I agree with the above arguments. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 08:30, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.