- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Redirect to Re-cut_trailers#Kill_Christ. NawlinWiki 11:31, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Unverified, no assertion of notability, no sources, no independent commentary. Been sitting like this since mid 2005. Nearly 2 years. Sort it or kill it. -Docg 21:10, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. I can't figure out this wasn't speedied in the first place. Wouldn't this have qualified for db-web? ---Charles 21:17, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. A non-article, a bit of self-promotion apparently, from a Carnegie-Melon DSL. --Tony Sidaway 21:25, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]- Good call by FCYTravis. Yes, redirect to Re-cut trailers. --Tony Sidaway 21:41, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect - relevant content is already merged into Re-cut trailers, so it's logically redirected there. FCYTravis 21:30, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Em? Redirect to another mention of the same that's also has "no assertion of notability, no sources, and no independent commentary." That's not terribly attractive as an option.--Docg 21:42, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- A quick Google on "Kill Christ" + re-cut trailer suggests that it could and should be reliably sourced (mentions in Chicago Tribune blog, 1UP.com, etc.). But it's doubtful that there's enough for a stand-alone article. FCYTravis 21:59, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect if information exists elsewhere. --Dhartung | Talk 03:48, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.