Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kill Time Communication
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus with leave to speedy renominate. Listed for 13 days with no arguments for deletion aside from the nominator but not enough participation to determine consensus. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:36, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Kill Time Communication (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Minor manga and porn publisher Orange Mike | Talk 20:10, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. -- —Farix (t | c) 21:07, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Administrative Comment There's something funky about the link to this discussion from the article, but I can't figure out what's not working correctly. —Quasirandom (talk) 22:32, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Discussion Comment References on this article and on Comic Valkyrie indicate there is enough coverage of that magazine to make it notable. Recognizing that notability is not inherited, nonetheless when a company produces a notable product it strongly suggests that the company is notable in some way. Reserving my !vote pending checking whether any of the magazine references also discuss in some way the company as well. —Quasirandom (talk) 22:37, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I thought the same thing about that magazine, although I know "not inherited" rule. -- deerstop. 09:44, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. I'll leave it to others to go through the hits. --Gwern (contribs) 22:44 26 April 2010 (GMT)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply] - The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.