- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 21:29, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Kinaxis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article re-created after speedy deletion as unambiguous advertising. AfD for a hard precedent.
Another non-notable provider of supply chain management solutions. Unambiguous advertisement and intentionally vague sales patter:
- offers an on-demand supply chain response management service for demand-supply planning, monitoring, and collaborative response
- product addresses functional areas including sales and operations planning (S&OP), demand management, supply management, supply chain risk management, supply chain visibility, and lean manufacturing.
References are to trade award coverage in the hometown paper, a sales brochure white paper, unavailable, apparently hosted at a trade website, blogs, and press releases. I find no better. Recommend protection against re-creation. Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 19:11, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.
- Delete per nom. Clearly presented as spam; no encyclopaedic content about the company itself. No evidence of notbiliy found. RichardOSmith (talk) 19:25, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as commercial spam for an amorphous "solutions" product. Carrite (talk) 20:52, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per lack of media mentions. I didn't see anything notable (aside from the company's website) on both Yahoo! and Google. SwisterTwister talk 04:45, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:RS (the listed "sources" don't appear convincing for notability). Richwales (talk · contribs) 05:00, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I also note that most of the work on the article has been done from a brand new WP:SPA. Richwales (talk · contribs) 05:02, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.