- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 21:16, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Kindermint (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Despite my best endeavours to tidy this up, I cannot see any notability here. The firm has been taken over - by a company which also seems to be non-notable - and no longer exists. Three of the eight citations are to dead links, several simply say it no longer exists (so what they originally said is unavailable) and others appear to be blog posts/adverts by agents. Page was created in 2014 by User:Cpvetos, a permanently blocked sockpuppet. Emeraude (talk) 17:26, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:09, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:09, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Lots of reasons already covered better then I could by the nominator. --Adamant1 (talk) 08:48, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. No substantive claim of notability. Dorama285 (talk) 22:47, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete 2 gnews hits. One is a press release the other a blog. Fails WP:GNG. LibStar (talk) 14:23, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.