Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/King Edward VI Communication with Higham Lane

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Higham Lane School. WjBscribe 04:07, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

King Edward VI Communication with Higham Lane

Merged relevant article information into main article King Edward VI College, Nuneaton, rest of the article is not notable enough for its own article WP:CORP and doesn't meet the WP:NPOV standards Rob89 10:37, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for reasons stated above Rob89 10:37, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 12:06, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The author has some sort of unidentified chip on his shoulder and is clearly hoping to push a POV. At times the article steers very close to out and out gibberish. BTLizard 13:58, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge There is no merit in having an artifcle on the links between two schools. This is at best a poor articlem but so is that on Higham Lane School, which is tagged as lacking notability. I thought it was agreed that all high schools were notable, even if the article on them was a poor stub. I would accordingly recommend that any worthwhile material should be merged into Higham Lane School. After wrting this I will edit the article under discussion to provide a link to that (currently missing). Peterkingiron 00:19, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. But first, Merge any useful and encyclopedic information (IF there is any) into the King Edward VI College, Nuneaton and Higham Lane School articles. I thought this article was going to be about some interesting royal communications between the King Edward VI and some government official or perhaps a peasant named Higham Lane. Boy was I disappointed. Once merged, no redirect is needed: the title is entirely misleading and otherwise useless. --T-dot (Talk | $contribs) 16:21, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I've merged useful information into Higham Lane School (information was already in the King Edward VI College, Nuneaton article), feel free to add any other useful information you feel I've missed out but I think the rest of the article is junk. Rob89 18:52, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.