Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kings Park Baseball Complex
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 18:26, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Kings Park Baseball Complex (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Minor neighborhood park not notable Weaponbb7 (talk) 20:08, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Non-Notable and no sources. IamtheLOL (talk) 21:14, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- comment this does not seem to be an official name, that is why no search hits. But I would disagree that the park is a minor neighbourhood park, more like a major neighbourhood park. But it is mentioned [1][2]. There would be at least 4 possible backlinks to this article from Wikipedia if they were put in. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:08, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- LOL wonderful we have confirmed they have toilet... congrats you made me smileWeaponbb7 (talk) 01:24, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Upper Ferntree Gully, Victoria#Natural features, where the park is already described in sufficient detail. Most of the material in this article is trivial (and unsourced). Deor (talk) 01:52, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:10, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:10, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom - there are no indications of notability Nick-D (talk) 08:59, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.