- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was userfy to the userspace by Juliancolton. Non-admin closure. MuZemike 19:52, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Kitacon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
An anime convention that has yet to be held. No significant coverage by reliable third-party sources to establish notability. In fact, four of the reference are to other Wikipedia articles and the rest are derived from press releases, the convention's website, and a directory of conventions. Fails WP:ORG and WP:CRYSTAL. The number or types of guest doesn't make a convention notable unless reliable third party sources report on the fact. --Farix (Talk) 12:36, 23 February 2009 (UTC) Farix (Talk) 12:36, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete or userfy To soon to tell whatever it's notable. The convention can't inherit the notability of its guests. Right now it works like an ad. Google hit for Kitacon key word alone : 875,000 ; Google hit for Kitacon -wikipedia key words : 3,760. I won't mistake by much saying that there is indeed an advertisement effect from being on Wikipedia for this article. If user:alexmunroe is willing to have it in his/her user space then that would be the best solution.--KrebMarkt 12:59, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Userfy and Delete I understand what everyone is saying, I've moved it to my userpage, I'll recreate the article if at some point in the future the convention gains significant notability and has enough third party sources to back it up.--AlexMunroe (Talk) 14:04, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete FOR NOW per WP:CRYSTAL, allow re-creation when/if convention actually occurs. 159.182.1.4 (talk) 15:07, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Userfy and delete for now - Might be notable later, but it isn't currently. Grandmartin11 (talk) 17:59, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.