- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was snow delete. Blueboy96 22:41, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Kleeb (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Contested PROD. Wikipedia is not for things made up one day. Beeblebrox (talk) 05:59, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. —Beeblebrox (talk) 06:02, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. —Beeblebrox (talk) 06:05, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete. Nonsense. Exploding Boy (talk) 06:43, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete (even with a capitalized 'D'). It's not nonsense, but it is a neologism with no notability and is likely to be made up. Wikipedia has high standards even for notable ones. Kotiwalo (talk) 06:54, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete WP:NEO. -Falcon8765 (talk) 08:24, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete - rubbish. PKT(alk) 15:27, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as a non-notable neologism or something made up in one day. — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 16:30, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.