Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Klingon Special Operations

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 00:10, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This article on an organisation within the fictional Star Trek universe has no sources, and appears (to me) to be either original research or non-canonical fancruft, for as far as I know, no such organisation is detailed in the episodes. If the organisation's canonical existance, along with the contents of the article, can be proven to be verifiable through the use of reliable, cited sources, I will reconsider.

This article was PRODed, with the prod removed by the article's creator. The only other changes made to the article were to remove a large section of text, although I believe the comments I made in both the Prod nomination and above still apply to the rest of the article. -- Saberwyn 03:52, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - non-canon, I think. It might come from books but then the author should respond to the prod. - Richardcavell 04:58, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Conditional delete -> If the author can provide very good references for this material, including page numbers (if it comes from Star Trek books), then I'd change to a keep. As it is, this looks like original research or copyvio. Send the original editor an advisory to move this into his userspace for further editing, and then resubmit it when it's of better quality. Captainktainer 09:08, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, not verified, reads like fancruft, not wikified. JIP | Talk 13:33, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Non cannon, might be speculative original research. Bige1977 16:30, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I don't non-canonical information from fiction belongs in wikipedia. Dspserpico 20:48, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Non-canon; not from any of the novels either. --Mhking 23:12, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Looks like some information someone came up with pertaining to their Star Trek PBeM game. Not particularly well-written information, either. ekedolphin 02:45, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.