This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Early keep. Totally rewritten. No more dicdef. mikka (t) 20:41, 25 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
*Delete. dicdef MCB 07:05, 22 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Wikipedia is not a dictionary. (And refer creator to Wiktionary.) - Mgm|(talk) 08:58, August 22, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Not even sure if this really qualifies for transiki to Wiktionary. --Lord Voldemort (Dark Mark) 17:30, 22 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- keep now expanded, please take another look. --Irpen 18:08, August 25, 2005 (UTC)
- keep. It is actually a new article. mikka (t) 18:18, 25 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- keep. It is important part of East Slavic heritage. --Ghirlandajo 18:19, 25 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
For deletionists I would advise to learn how to use google. mikka (t) 18:18, 25 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: The deletion votes, including my nomination, were based on a 1-line article, not the one up now. MCB 18:43, 25 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The article has been nicely expanded; I withdraw my nomination. MCB 18:43, 25 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. As per Ghirlandajo. --Wojsyl (talk) 19:26, 25 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.