Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Koshi Bird Observatory

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect to Kosi Bird Observatory. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 23:09, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Koshi Bird Observatory

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It has exactly the same content as the article Kosi Bird Observatory. Moreover it is orphaned, dead-end and uncategorized Wishva de Silva (talk) 09:52, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:03, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:03, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:03, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect. The two articles were created the same day by the same editor, who was presumably unaware how to set up a redirect from one alternate spelling to another. AFD not needed, this could have just been redirected. --do ncr am 17:20, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect, Doncram is right, all we need to do is redirect this one. If we could close it now we can redirect it immediately. Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:29, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect Doncram is right, redirect is in order. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 21:17, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.