Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kosovo Forces fatalities (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 10:31, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kosovo Forces fatalities

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This seems just a wee bit too morbid to be encylopedic, and yet pointless because each individual fatality is not notable, while a summary would be. Granted, now that someone went through the trouble of gathering this information it'd be a shame not to preserve it somewhere, but Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 12:20, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as Wikipedia is not a memorial site. This article is mostly a list of non-notable people. Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 14:36, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. —Nick-D (talk) 10:41, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. This is one of a series of articles listing casualties of recent conflicts in excessive detail created by the now indef blocked editor User:Top Gun and their socks (often to push his or her own calculations of the casualties of these conflicts based on the media reports they came across). These articles are steadily being deleted over time and there's no reason to keep this one. Nick-D (talk) 10:41, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I note that Top Gun's keep rationale in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kosovo Forces fatalities (which was one of my nominations for deletion) included that "there are no reliable figures of Kfor casualties in Kosovo anywhere except in this article", which basically makes this OR (again, another Top Gun habit and one of the reasons they're indef blocked). Nick-D (talk) 10:50, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:21, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.