- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 21:23, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable company, haven't produced anything, website is dead, fails Google test — Frecklefoot | Talk 16:46, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Per nom. --grummerx 20:12, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. company has released previous software for private investors. It is in the middle of producing a game that will be featured in the magazines pc gamer and pc zone. It is earning money. It has a website that is being re-developed.
- I can't find it with a Google search and the website is barely a stub. I still vote to delete. — Frecklefoot | Talk 18:43, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. i am part of the kotel team and we are a strong and growing company which will thrive and be successful. swillard8 2/10/06 — Possible single purpose account: swillard8 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other contributions outside this topic.
- You haven't done anything noteworthy yet. You can have an article when you actually do something notable, like release a product (that sells). Just so you can see I'm not pushing my own agenda, see what Wikipedia is not and the criteria for a company to have an article on Wikipedia. — Frecklefoot | Talk 18:35, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Various private applications have been released. How can kotel systems have made money if they hadn't released anything.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.195.141.130 (talk • contribs)
- Delete; even says in the article it is a small company. The website is "under development". May meet new spam csd.--Andeh 08:57, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not very notable. --Kjoonlee 13:51, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete and salt the earth. Does not meet WP:CORP at all. --Storkk 12:27, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.