- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. ... discospinster talk 21:08, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Kryptic Enigma (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Article fails Wikipedia:Notability (music). Article is a speedy candidate under WP:CSD#A7, speedy nomination tag was removed by 199.176.183.15 (talk · contribs) on this edit. SWik78 (talk) 19:04, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete However, you don't have to bring it here, just replace the speedy tag and warn the IP about removing them. Dustitalk to me 19:11, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment The author of the article is Nik592 (talk · contribs), the tag was removed by 199.176.183.15 (talk · contribs). As per WP:CSD, any editor who is not the creator of a page may remove a speedy tag from it. There is nothing to warn the IP about since he is not doing anything against the rules unless we want to go ahead and prove sockpuppetry. This just seemed easier. SWik78 (talk) 19:14, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment its possible that the two could be proved as socks, but its not definate. I didn't completley read up on WP:CSD, but thanks for pointing that out. Dustitalk to me 19:45, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment There is also nothing to stop you re-adding the tag. Article asserts no notability, so I have retagged it for speedy deletion.--BelovedFreak 20:56, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.