- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was DELETE. — JIP | Talk 07:21, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
- delete non-notable website - Ritchy 18:49, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
- Keep Just because you haven't heard of it doesn't mean it isn't notable. (I actualy haven't heard of it either) This article just doesn't give enough information to distinguish what this is or what it does. If someone can provide more infomation on this, it might become a valid article. I think its too soon to delete it. If it turns out that you are right and that this is pure junk ill change my vote. Tobyk777 19:19, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete is inherently non notable and probably never will be. If this article about a website is present, why not allow every website to have n article on Wikipedia. Doesn't seem like a good idea. Molotov (talk)
19:21, 18 October 2005 (UTC) - Delete nn. mikka (t) 20:04, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete: doesn't seem to be notable. FWIW, Alexa rank is 375,973 and only 92 incoming links are reported by Google, so it fails the guidelines proposed by WP:WEB. Haeleth 22:55, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.