Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kumar (drag queen)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was nomination withdrawn. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 05:43, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This was initially speedy-tagged by a fellow new page patroller, John Lake. I removed that and he proposed deletion as non-notable, so I'm taking it to AfD on his behalf. Chaser T 04:04, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Even for a small country like Singapore, to be the leading drag performer is notable enough to keep, imho. I found websites (only a few in English) that confirm this [1] [2], though I acknowledge that both have reliability issues.--Chaser T 04:04, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Chaser. If she were in New York, it'd be borderline non-notable, but in Singapore it's a different story. Plenty of google presence. Fireplace 04:40, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep. I tagged it as a speedy then as a prod simply because I found no references in google. I read the references now provided and the second one of the above does call Kumar (drag queen) the most notable one in Singapore and that is notable enough for me. Since have checked with Webcrawler and found [3] that also calls this person the most notable drag queen there.--John Lake 04:47, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Thanks, John. Maybe I should have shown you what I'd found first. Since this is an apparent quasi- withdrawal by nominator I'd request closure.--Chaser T 04:49, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.