Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kumar Parakala

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2012 September 26.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:45, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kumar Parakala

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The individual concerned does not seem to be notable enough for inclusion on Wikipedia. wctaiwan (talk) 05:51, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This article was created by an admitted, paid representative of Kumar Parakala. The creator works for the PR firm that represents the subject, and has a strong Conflict of Interest. Further, I believe the article does not meet the notability guidelines for Wikipedia, and as such, should be deleted. AndrewN ^talk 05:56, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No notability, reads like a resume rather than an encyclopedia article. - SudoGhost ™ 06:01, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete : Lacks the significant coverage to pass WP:GNG, also WP:COI issues. Mtking (talk) 07:15, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 16:23, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete; no proof of notability. The fact the article was made by a PR man is secondary. —Jeremy v^_^v ^{Components:V S M} 19:32, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.