Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kutt Calhoun

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete (both) Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 18:52, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kutt Calhoun

Non-notable artist. Has released one album and one mixtape, neither of which charted nationally. Fails WP:MUSIC. Including non-notable album which fails WP:MUSIC#Albums. —Hello, Control ^{Hello, Tony} 14:06, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —Hello, Control ^{Hello, Tony} 14:17, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Only one article on google news, and that's a mention of him at the South By South West festival. No major hits, no major releases. --Nick Penguin_(contribs) 20:12, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, article fails to establish notability as per WP:MUSIC. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 11:25, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Not exactly an authority on Wiki's Notability guidelines, but I can certainly see where this is coming from. Perhaps if/when his second album releases later this year, if it makes some noise (charts, has some singles, etc) then his page could be recreated. However, in regards to B.L.E.V.E. not charting nationally, is Billboard's "Album: Top Heatseekers (West North Central)" considered as national as it charted 8th on that one. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mizery Made (talk • contribs) 04:20, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment That's actually a regional chart ("West North Central"—the national one is just "Top Heatseekers" period). —Hello, Control ^{Hello, Tony} 09:15, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - Comment I actually figured that out a little on my own after I posted it. Seeing as the East region is excluded, hardly national. Again, not familiar with the guidelines and even though I've read over them several times and such, still can't say I got a good grasp of them. However, would merging be a route possible of taking? What I mean is, possibly merging his article into the Strange Music label page and then when/if he releases his album later this year, it could be discussed about breaking it out into it's own article. If not, then delete remains the best option.—Mizery Made (talk) 00:13, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as per nom. BWH76 (talk) 16:34, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.