- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 06:11, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- L'Desh Fresh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I initially PRODed this with the following rationale: "Non-notable fictional product created as part of an awareness campaign. The only included sources are either primary, or are not about the fictional product. Searches brought up no substantial coverage." It was later de-proded with the rationale to "consider merge to Water.org". I, however, disagree with this alternative. The lack of reliably sourced content in the article means that there is nothing currently that should be merged, and the lack of any kind of significant coverage in searches means that it is too non-notable to be covered in the water.org article. Rorshacma (talk) 01:29, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Products-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 11:11, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: An article on a 2009 advertising campaign by WaterPartners (which shortly afterwards merged into what became Water.org). As the nominator says, there seems to be a dearth of coverage to demonstrate that the campaign achieved notability. The suggested WP:ATD is a merge into the Water.org article; however there is no mention of this campaign on the water.org website, probably because it was a campaign by a predecessor organisation. A merge/redirect to WaterPartners would be more appropriate, though I still feel that the lack of coverage makes that WP:UNDUE. AllyD (talk) 11:11, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Other than the dead website, I find no mentions of it elsewhere. I would have possibly added it as a line or two in the water.org article if we had one source, but none turn up. Oaktree b (talk) 14:55, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
- Redirect to Water.org as WP:ATD. Minimally appears to be a useful search topic. Also WP:CHEAP. ~Kvng (talk) 13:38, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete - No coverage in multiple, independent, reliable sources. Insufficiently notable to warrant a redirect. If further sourcing is found, a line could be added WaterPartners. MaxnaCarta (talk) 03:54, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.