- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 00:36, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- LAMIP (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Just another run-of-the-mill media player that isn't notable, doesn't demonstrate notability, doesn't claim notability, has no sources, and doesn't do anything that every other media player written by Joe Bob doesn't do. Miami33139 (talk) 04:00, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- CSD G11. Product that gives no assertion of notability and doesn't seem to serve any purpose other than advertising. Firestorm Talk 06:03, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - It isn't notable (in my opinion), doesn't demonstrate notability, and doesn't claim notability and has no sources. I believe it to be blatant advertising (CSD G11). OlYellerTalktome 07:08, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - "this is a media player" is not grounds for inclusion. Google doesn't seem to help to establish notability either. §FreeRangeFrog 19:21, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.